Real project record. Buyer and supplier identities are removed. The order has not yet been confirmed.
← All case studies
Spain1688 purchasingOutdoor installationTransparent pricing

Real sourcing case

How we sourced an outdoor LED strip and silicone channel for a Spanish buyer.

We checked the buyer's link, found another option when the required size was missing, translated the installation into a usable specification, contacted suppliers, showed the original prices, and compared two shipping routes to the Canary Islands.

Awaiting the buyer's end-client approvalProject activity: July–August 2026

Silicone channel

40 × 20 mm

Black surface, outdoor installation

LED requirement

24 V / red

IP65+ and at least 240 LEDs per metre

Original freight

RMB 3,065

45 kg air estimate with surcharges

Alternative rate

RMB 33/kg

Lower price, but slower and less predictable

From link to workable brief

The buyer knew the installation. The supplier listings did not yet match it.

A marketplace link can identify a product family without proving that the listed size, material, voltage, protection level, or accessories fit the actual job.

01

Check the link the buyer already found

The original 1688 listing did not show the required 40 × 20 mm channel. We reviewed it instead of treating the link as a finished product choice.

02

Find another option and give the buyer the link

We found another listing that appeared closer to the requested dimensions and sent it directly to the buyer. The buyer could inspect the page and replied that it looked suitable.

03

Confirm how the product would actually be installed

We asked about exterior dimensions, empty channel versus a complete light, LED width, outdoor exposure, material, colour, bending direction, continuous lengths, fixing clips, end caps, and connectors.

04

Search again when the first options did not meet the brief

Listings were compared across voltage, waterproofing, width, height, and LED density. Several options met only part of the requirement. The buyer also sent another reference link, and we continued the search from there.

Requirement record

The specification was built around the façade, not around a marketplace title.

The total length was later clarified as 67 metres across six sections. The longest section was 12 metres, which also raised a voltage-drop question for a 24 V strip powered from one end.

ComponentEmpty black silicone channel plus a separately installed LED strip
Channel size40 mm wide; 20 or 25 mm depth acceptable
UseVertical outdoor installation on a building façade; no bending required
Surface concernBlack finish should resist UV exposure and should not peel or lose colour easily
LEDFixed red, 24 V, regulated power supply, IP65 or above, at least 240 LEDs per metre
Lengths12, 12, 10, 12, 9, and 12 metres
Accessories12 end caps, 70 omega fixing clips, and 12 power connections

Supplier communication

When the listing and the seller did not agree, the uncertainty stayed visible.

Contradictory waterproof information

One product page indicated that the item was not waterproof, while the seller described it as suitable for outdoor rain. We told the buyer that the actual protection level remained unclear instead of turning the seller's reply into a confirmed fact.

Not every high-density strip fit

A 280-LED-per-metre COB option looked stronger on density, but the buyer rejected it because the strip shape was too narrow and too tall for the intended installation.

No adhesive backing

The available red three-row channel did not include rear adhesive. For a long installation, we explained that mechanical fixing could be more durable than relying on adhesive alone.

Accessories and sealing

The accessory list was confirmed with end caps, omega clips, and power connections. The supplier was also asked to seal both ends for outdoor use.

Logistics comparison

We kept looking after the first workable freight quote.

The first estimate used an available air route. A silicone-channel supplier later offered a special route to the Canary Islands at a much lower rate. The cheaper route was slower and had a less predictable departure, so both the saving and the limitation were shown.

ComparisonFirst available estimateAlternative route found later
DestinationCanary IslandsCanary Islands
Quoted basis45 kg, 60 × 60 × 30 cm35 kg estimated silicone channel weight
Price55 RMB/kg + RMB 260 overweight + RMB 330 remote-area surcharge25 RMB/kg + 8 RMB/kg island surcharge
Estimated totalRMB 3,065RMB 1,155 for the 35 kg channel estimate
Effective rateAbout RMB 68.1/kgRMB 33/kg
TimingAir estimateAbout 25–30 days after actual departure; consolidation can add waiting time

These were not identical services or identical chargeable weights. The rate comparison shows why the second route was materially cheaper, while the page also records its slower and less predictable timing. Once both products were considered together at an estimated 47 kg, the special-route estimate became RMB 1,551.

Visible pricing

Supplier prices, third-party costs, and our service fee were kept separate.

The client received the original supplier prices, product links, and supplier screenshots. Our RMB 300 service fee was disclosed separately. The product prices did not include a hidden China Partner Hub margin.

Silicone channel quotationRMB 16.5 per metre; RMB 1,155 calculated on 70 metres
Product linksProvided so the buyer could check the supplier pages and specifications directly
Supplier evidenceSupplier quotation screenshots sent to support the figures shown in the PDF
China Partner Hub feeRMB 300, approximately EUR 39, stated separately
Product markupNone added by China Partner Hub
Third-party freightCalculated from the carrier or supplier route and confirmed again against packed weight and volume

Redacted communication excerpts

The claims above map back to the project record.

Spanish excerpts are retained to show the original communication. Names, addresses, and supplier identities are excluded.

Product search

Redacted WhatsApp excerpt showing China Partner Hub identifying a missing 40 by 20 millimetre size and sending another 1688 product link
We explained that the buyer's original link did not include the required 40 × 20 mm size and sent another 1688 listing. The buyer later replied, “Bien, parece correcta.” The buyer's name is redacted.

Supplier claim not treated as proof

WhatsApp excerpt explaining that a listing said the product was not waterproof while the seller claimed rain resistance
The page and seller gave different answers. We told the buyer that the actual protection level remained unknown.

Lower freight route found later

WhatsApp excerpt showing a 47 kilogram Canary Islands freight estimate at 33 RMB per kilogram, totalling 1551 RMB
The later route was estimated at RMB 1,551 for 47 kg, compared with the earlier RMB 3,065 test quote. The same message also disclosed consolidation and departure-time uncertainty.

No product markup

WhatsApp excerpt confirming original supplier prices, no product markup, and a separate 39 euro service fee
Original supplier prices were passed through without a product markup. The buyer's follow-up and our separate EUR 39 service fee remain visible in the record.

Current status

The buyer is waiting for the end client to confirm.

No purchase, production, or delivery outcome is claimed on this page. If the order proceeds, the packed weight, final freight charge, product confirmation, and delivery result will be added as a dated update.

Have a product link already?

Send the link and the real use case.

We can first check what the listing does not answer, what needs supplier confirmation, and whether the sourcing path is worth continuing.